Skip to content

Fixed code syntax issues #7486

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

javiereguiluz
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ without making them hard dependencies.
Background
----------

Suppose you have an `InvoiceBundle` which provides invoicing functionality
and a `CustomerBundle` that contains customer management tools. You want
Suppose you have an ``InvoiceBundle`` which provides invoicing functionality
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIRC we agreed on not enclosing bundle names with backticks at all.

Along with custom filters, you can also add custom `functions` and register
`global variables`.
Along with custom filters, you can also add custom functions and register
global variables.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe these were supposed to link to other sections (note the entries at the end of the document)?

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Feb 19, 2017

👍

Status: Reviewed

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Feb 19, 2017

Thank you @javiereguiluz.

xabbuh added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2017
This PR was squashed before being merged into the 2.7 branch (closes #7486).

Discussion
----------

Fixed code syntax issues

Commits
-------

16e8b05 Fixed code syntax issues
@xabbuh xabbuh closed this Feb 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants